Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Ishwar Lal Gujar vs State Urban Developmentors … on 10 March, 2025
Author: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
[2025:RJ-JP:10828]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11152/2014
Ishwar Lal Gujar son of Late Harji Gujar, aged about 60 years,
resident of Village Daulatganj-Nayagaon, Tehsil Ladpura, District
Kota (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Department
of Urban Development & Housing Department, Govt. of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Director, Local Bodies, Localself Govt. Department,
Rajasthan, Jaipur
3. The District Collector, Kota
4. Urban Improvement Trust, Kota through its Secretary
5. Tehsildar, Ladpura, District Kota
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Seema Moyal for
Mr. Naseemuddin Quazi
For Respondent(s) :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
10/03/2025
On 22.05.2024, this Court passed the following order:-
“Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the land of Khasra No.180, Village
Daulatganj @ Naya Gaon was given a new
Khasra No.182. However, there is no document
on record to substantiate the aforesaid
submission.
In view thereof, learned counsel for the
petitioner prays for and is granted a week’s time
to substantiate the aforesaid submission by
production of relevant document(s).
(Downloaded on 10/03/2025 at 10:05:45 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:10828] (2 of 2) [CW-11152/2014]
List the matter on 30.05.2024 as prayed.”
On 16.12.2024, time was sought on behalf of the petitioner
stating that arguing counsel was not available.
This Court, in the interest of justice, granted last opportunity
to the petitioner and directed listing of the matter on 10.02.2025.
On that date again, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed
for and was granted last opportunity of four weeks in terms of the
order dated 22.05.2024 and the matter was directed to be listed
today.
Today also, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an
adjournment.
However, in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
no case for adjournment is made out. Since, the petitioner has not
been able to substantiate the submission as recorded in the order
dated 22.05.2024, this civil writ petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed
of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/23
(Downloaded on 10/03/2025 at 10:05:45 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)