Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Keshav Meena vs Smt. Aparna Arora … on 10 March, 2025
Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Bhuwan Goyal
[2025:RJ-JP:10832-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 614/2024
Keshav Meena S/o Sh. Amar Lal Meena, aged About 31 Years,
R/oVillage Emartapura Post Ondh Tehsil Mandrayal District
Karauli.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Smt. Aparna Arora, Additional Chief Secretary, Forest
Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. Shri Munish Kumar Garg, The Principal Chief Conservator
Of Forests, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Shri Mahesh Chand Gupta, The Chief Conservator Of
Forest, Jaipur.
4. Shri Jitendra Meena, The Range Forest Officer, District
Karauli.
5. Shri Sumit Bansal, The Conservator Of Forest, Karauli.
6. Shri Piyush Kumar Sharma, The Deputy Conservator Of
Forest Karauli,
7. Shri Tinku Jatav, The Regional Forest Officer, Mandrayal,
Dist. Karauli.
8. Shir Nilabh Saxena, The District Collector And District
Magistrate, Karauli.
9. Shri Brajesh Gupta, The Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Mandrayal, District Karauli.
10. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary,
Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satyapal Poshwal with
Mr. Abilasha Choudhary
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG with
Ms. Aditi Vats
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
(Downloaded on 11/03/2025 at 09:58:33 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:10832-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-614/2024]
10/03/2025
1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful
disobedience of order dated 04.01.2024 passed in D. B. Civil Writ
(PIL) Petition No.20691/2023.
2. Though submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is
that the order of the Court is not complied with, from the reply of
the respondents it is revealed that as far as temporary huts are
concerned, that has already been removed and for removal of
pacca construction, after passing order under Section 91 of the
Land Revenue Act, 1956, notice was issued for removal and
towards that a letter was sent to the District Collector on
25.02.2025 for providing police force so that there may not be any
resistance over the removal of the encroachment.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also disclosed to this
Court today during the course of hearing that person against
whom, the proceedings had been initiated and who were going to
be removed, has approached this Court by filing S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No.3142/2025, wherein there is an interim order passed
by this Court on 28.02.2025.
4. In view of the reply which has been filed by the respondents
and the disclosure made by the learned counsel for the petitioner,
this contempt petition cannot proceed and is closed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
N.Gandhi/Tanisha/14
(Downloaded on 11/03/2025 at 09:58:33 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)