Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Mithun Mannewar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 15 April, 2025
Author: Sanjay Karol
Bench: Sanjay Karol
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.16 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for SLP (Crl.) No(s).3419/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment
and order dated 13-11-2024 in MCRC
No.7877/2024 passed by the High Court of
Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur]
MITHUN MANNEWAR & ORS. PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH RESPONDENT(S)
IA No. 57075/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 57073/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
Date : 15-04-2025 This matter was called
on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
For Petitioner(s) :Dr. Rajesh Pandey, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Ayushi Pandey, Adv.
Ms. Aswathi M.k., AOR
For Respondent(s) :
Signature Not Verified
Ms. Sugandha Jain, Standing Counsel
Digitally signed by
NAVEEN D
Date: 2025.04.15
SLP(Crl) No.3419 of 2025 1
17:04:54 IST
Reason:
Mr. Prabodh Kumar, AOR
Upon hearing the counsel the Court made
the following
O R D E R
1. Petitioners challenge the judgment and
order dated 13-11-2024 in MCRC
No.7877/2024 passed by the High Court of
Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur, titled “Mithun
Mannewar & Ors. vs. State of
Chhattisgarh”.
2. The petitioners were arrested in
connection with Crime No.44 of 2024
registered at Nagarda Police Station,
Sakti District, Chhattisgarh for the
offences punishable under Sections 147
148, 149, 294, 304, 323 & 506 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the
respondent vehemently opposes for grant of
bail.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the
parties, and perused the material placed
on record, we are of the considered view
SLP(Crl) No.3419 of 2025 2
that the petitioners have made out case
for interference with the impugned order
dated 13-11-2024.
5. Considering the totality of
circumstances and also the fact that the
petitioners were in custody since
05.10.2024, we are inclined to grant bail
to the petitioners on such terms as may be
fixed by the Trial Court. Ordered
accordingly.
6. To comply with the order, the
petitioners shall be produced before the
Trial Court forthwith.
7. Accordingly, the Special Leave
Petition is disposed of.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of.
(D. NAVEEN) (ANU BHALLA)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
SLP(Crl) No.3419 of 2025 3