Priti Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 7 March, 2025

0
2

Patna High Court – Orders

Priti Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 7 March, 2025

Author: Partha Sarthy

Bench: Partha Sarthy

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10741 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-904 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Priti Kumari W/O Sujeet Kumar Resident of village- Kataia, P.S- Hariharganj,
                 District- Palamu (Jharkhand)

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

grant of anticipatory bail apprehending her arrest in connection

with Excise P.S. Case no. 904 of 2024, registered under section

30(a), 32(3) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

2016.

3. As per the prosecution case, 9 litres of liquor was

recovered from the motorcycle in question and the accused was

taken into custody.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner who happens to be a lady has been falsely implicated

in the case only for the reason that she happens to be the

registered owner of the vehicle in question which was being

driven by her brother. She has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10741 of 2025(2) dt.07-03-2025
2/2

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by

learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R, no

incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner’s

possession, the vehicle in question at the time of recovery being

driven by the petitioner’s brother and the petitioner not having

any antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

2016, it is directed that the petitioner above named, in the event

of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within

a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in

connection with Excise P.S. Case no. 904 of 2024 on furnishing

bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

learned Special Judge, Excise-II, Aurangabad.

(Partha Sarthy, J)
Shiv/-

U        T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here